TREACHERY
AKA B.Liar and Brown Watch
'.....the people must be led slowly and unconsciously, with each step being disguised as having an economic advantage towards the federal superstate until it is irreversible.' Jean Monnet 1952
========================
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed. If you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly. You may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you, and only a precarious chance of survival.
There may even be a worse case, you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." Winston S. Churchill
=================================
26th January 2009
Revealed:
Our dearly beloved Government smuggles data protection reform into bill
Typically, the “Reform” is hard to find in the bill
Monday, 26, Jan 2009 01:09
By Ian Dunt
The government is being accused of smuggling a clause into today's coroners and justice bill which will effectively overwrite Britain's data protection laws.
Clause 152 of the bill, which has garnered little media attention due to the headline issues which surround it, grants any government minister the power to enforce the sharing of any information to anyone they please.
"It's a Henry VIII clause," No2ID general secretary told politics.co.uk.
"They've simply created a new piece of legislation which can alter any act of parliament and enable any piece of information to be passed from any person to any other person."
Under the new law, a minister would be able to write an information sharing order which would enforce the sharing of data. The order would be laid before parliament and produced by affirmative resolution procedure.
This form of statutory legislation only allows MPs to vote for or against an order, but not debate them, amend them or alter them. The votes are very poorly attended and the orders very rarely rejected.
One irony is that, because the orders would be made under data protection legislation, an untrained eye would presume the order protected data, rather than transfer it.
Privacy campaigners are extremely concerned about the move, and point in particular to the danger of it being combined with the plans to keep a database of all phone calls, text and emails sent or received by UK citizens. That data would also be open to an information sharing order, potentially to private companies or foreign intelligence agencies.
Mr Herbert added: "No-one trusts the government over privacy. And this is evidence you shouldn't.
"We were promised after the HMRC data-loss disaster they wouldn't do it again. But they are snooping addicts - who have now started lying about their habit."
Today's coroners and justice bill contains several highly controversial clauses, including private coroners inquests, an end to the sexual jealousy defence in murder trials and witness anonymity proposals.
11th December 2008
They're at it again! Will the treachery of this government never cease?
Justice Secretary Jack Straw is apparently 'working hard' to abolish/amend the Act of Settlement which prevents Roman Catholics acceding to the Throne of the United Kingdom. It also prevents the Monarch from marrying a Roman Catholic.
Cranmer has already rehearsed the arguments for retention of this Act, so he will not bore his readers and communicants with the details.
He is only covering the issue again because Scottish Secretary Jim Murphy has revealed that ministers were 'working hard' to overhaul this foundational constitutional piece of legislation. Chris Bryant, the deputy leader of the House of Commons and a former Anglican priest, is also pushing for the law to be changed.
Jim Murphy is yet another Roman Catholic Scottish politician (...John Reid, Alex Salmond, Michael Martin...) who insists that the law is not only ‘divisive, discriminatory and offensive’, but ‘almost certainly’ a breach of human rights.
It is nothing of the sort. ……….
To read the complete article go to http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/
I suspect that Blair’s conversion to RC and his visits to Rome are no coincidence.
Please also visit the Brits at their Best website here: http://www.britsattheirbest.com/002516.php to see David Abbott’s recent correspondence with the Palace and Government concerning our Sovereign’s constitutional role. The quote” the Ministry declares that "it may be said that Parliament is sovereign as it holds sovereignty on behalf of the people it represents. . . .The Queen no longer has a political or executive role. . ." is most enlightening.
We live in very worrying times.
It is apparent that we have a Government, perhaps even Parliament intent on the destruction of our Monarchy and Democracy, and even our traditional religion.